Gomez-Garcia F, Ruano J, Aguilar-Luque Meters, Gay-Mimbrera J, Maestre-Lopez B, Sanz-Cabanillas JL, Carmona-Fernandez PJ, Gonzalez-Padilla Meters, Velez Garcia-Nieto A beneficial, Isla-Tejera B
3 months) involving the history research date additionally the full guide big date. With this specific suggestions, magazines must look into requesting authors from SRs to help you enhance its literary works research until the greeting of your SRs. SR profiles should also ascertain the full time slowdown within past research day of your product reviews with the intention that the evidence are up-to-big date getting productive clinical choice-and come up with.
Records
Glasziou P, Irwig L, Bain C, Colditz G: Scientific critiques into the healthcare a practical guide. From inside the. Cambridge: Cambridge College or university Push,; 2001: step one online resource (148 p.).
Chalmers I. Chapter 24: using systematic analysis and you can files regarding lingering products for medical and you can ethical demonstration structure, monitoring, and you can reporting. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG, publishers. Scientific studies inside health care : meta-data into the context. next ed. London: BMJ; 2001. p. 42943.
Sutton AJ, Cooper Nj-new jersey, Jones DR. Research synthesis since key to more coherent and productive search. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:30.
Beller EM, Chen JK, Wang UL, Glasziou PP. Was scientific ratings right up-to-day during the time of book? Syst Rev. 2013;2:thirty six.
Palese A great, Coletti S, Dante A great. Guide efficiency one of the higher impact factor nursing publications last year: a retrospective study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(4):54351.
Tsujimoto Y, Tsujimoto H, Kataoka Y, Kimachi Meters, Shimizu S, Ikenoue T, Fukuma S, Yamamoto Y, Fukuhara S. Most health-related critiques typed into the high-impression magazines neglected to sign in the newest protocols: a great meta-epidemiological analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;sixty.
Polkki T, Kanste O, Kaariainen Meters, Elo S, Kyngas H. This new methodological quality of health-related feedback had written in the high-effect breastfeeding publications: a review of the fresh new literary works. J Clin Nurs. 2014;23(34):315thirty-two.
Bath-Hextall F, Wharrad H, Leonardi-Bee J. Exercises equipment in proof situated behavior: assessment away from recyclable reading objects (RLOs) having understanding meta-studies. BMC Med Educ. 2011;.
Shea Bj, Hamel C, Wells GA, Bouter LM, KristSTAR was a reputable and you can good dimension tool to assess the latest methodological top-notch logical analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):101320.
Riado Minguez D, Kowalski Yards, Vallve Odena Yards, Longin Pontzen D, Jelicic Kadic A good, Jeric M, Dosenovic S, Jakus D, Vrdoljak M, Poklepovic Pericic T, mais aussi al. Methodological and you may reporting quality of logical critiques blogged about large positions guides https://kissbridesdate.com/no/svenske-bruder/ in neuro-scientific aches. Anesth Analg. 2017;
Samargandi OA, Hasan H. The caliber of logical critiques at hand functions: a diagnosis playing with AMSTAR. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(3):482e3e.
Sequeira-Byron P, Fedorowicz Z, Jagannath Va, Sharif MO. An enthusiastic AMSTAR comparison of one’s methodological quality of health-related studies off oral health care treatments composed about log off applied oral science (JAOS). J Appl Oral Sci. 2011;19(5):4407.
Medical recommendations and you will meta-analyses on the psoriasis: role out-of money provide, dispute interesting and you may bibliometric indices once the predictors of methodological high quality. Br J Dermatol. 2017;176(6):1633forty two.
Brandt JS, Downing Air-conditioning, Howard DL, Kofinas JD, Chasen ST. Violation classics inside obstetrics and you may gynecology: the latest 100 most often cited diary articles over the last 50 decades. In the morning J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(4):355.e1eight.
Huang Y, Mao C, Yuan J, Yang Z, Di Meters, Tam WW, Tang J. Delivery and you will epidemiological attributes out-of had written personal diligent research meta-analyses. PLoS You to. 2014;9(6):e100151.
Tam WWS, Lo KKH. Khalechelvam P: Acceptance regarding PRISMA declaration and you will top-notch medical analysis and you will meta-analyses typed for the nursing journals: a corner-sectional analysis. BMJ Discover. 2017;7(2):e013905.
Shea Blowjob, Bouter LM, Peterson J, Boers M, Andersson N, Ortiz Z, Ramsay T, Bai A beneficial, Shukla VK, Grimshaw JM. Outside validation out of a dimension equipment to evaluate clinical reviews (AMSTAR). PLoS You to definitely. 2007;2(12):e1350.